The best Hacker News stories from All from the past day

Go back

Latest posts:

Statistical Rethinking (2022 Edition)

Shenanigans on Microsoft Feedback Hub

Why Galesburg has no money

Why isn't there a universal data format for résumés?

Why isn't there a universal data format for résumés?

Essence: Desktop operating system built from scratch

Set up a practically free CDN

Set up a practically free CDN

hiccupFX.js

hiccupFX.js

DSLRs are dead, and lenses are never going to be the same

The Zen of Drinking Alone

The Zen of Drinking Alone

Nuclear startup Oklo gets thumbs-down from regulators

Switching from macOS to Pop_OS

Switching from macOS to Pop_OS

How bad is my gas stove?

Large Eruption Near Tonga, Heard in NZ. Tsunami at Tonga and Fiji

It’s not still the early days of blockchain

Ask HN: Should I publish my research code?

I'm looking for advice om whether I should publish my research code? The paper itself is enough to reproduce all the results. However, the implementation can easily take two months of work to get it right.<p>In my field many scientists tend to not publish the code nor the data. They would mostly write a note that code and data are available upon request.<p>I can see the pros of publishing the code as it's obviously better for open science and it makes the manuscript more solid and easier for anyone trying to replicate the work.<p>But on the other hand it's substantially more work to clean and organize the code for publishing, it will increase the surface for nitpicking and criticism (e.g. coding style, etc). Besides, many scientists look at code as a competitive advantage so in this case publishing the code will be removing the competitive advantage.

< 1 2 3 ... 629 630 631 632 633 ... 824 825 826 >